I want to generate a sine signal in C without using the standard function sin() in order to trigger sine shaped changes in the brightness of a LED. My basic idea was to use a lookup table with 40 points and interpolation.
Here's my first approach:
const int sine_table[40] = {0, 5125, 10125, 14876, 19260, 23170, 26509, 29196,
31163, 32364, 32767, 32364, 31163, 29196, 26509, 23170, 19260, 14876, 10125,
5125, 0, -5126, -10126,-14877, -19261, -23171, -26510, -29197, -31164, -32365,
-32768, -32365, -31164, -29197, -26510, -23171, -19261, -14877, -10126, -5126};
int i = 0;
int x1 = 0;
int x2 = 0;
float y = 0;
float sin1(float phase)
{
x1 = (int) phase % 41;
x2 = x1 + 1;
y = (sine_table[x2] - sine_table[x1])*((float) ((int) (40*0.001*i*100) % 4100)/100 - x1) + sine_table[x1];
return y;
}
int main()
{
while(1)
{
printf("%f ", sin1(40*0.001*i)/32768);
i = i + 1;
}
}
Unfortunately, this function sometimes returns values far bigger than 1. Furthermore, the interpolation doesn't seem to be good (I used this to create sine shaped brightness changes of a LED, but these are very unsmoooth).
Does anybody have a better idea to implement a sine generator in C?
OP's main problem is in generating the index for the table look-up.
OP's code attempts to access outside array sine_table[40]
leading to undefined behavior. Fix that at least.
const int sine_table[40] = {0, 5125, 10125, ...
...
x1 = (int) phase % 41; // -40 <= x1 <= 40
x2 = x1 + 1; // -39 <= x2 <= 41
y = (sine_table[x2] - sine_table[x1])*... // bad code, consider x1 = 40 or x2 = 40,41
Suggested change
x1 = (int) phase % 40; // mod 40, not 41
if (x1 < 0) x1 += 40; // Handle negative values
x2 = (x1 + 1) % 40; // Handle wrap-around
y = (sine_table[x2] - sine_table[x1])*...
There exist much better approaches, yet to focus on OP's method see below.
#include <math.h>
#include <stdio.h>
const int sine_table[40] = { 0, 5125, 10125, 14876, 19260, 23170, 26509, 29196,
31163, 32364, 32767, 32364, 31163, 29196, 26509, 23170, 19260, 14876, 10125,
5125, 0, -5126, -10126, -14877, -19261, -23171, -26510, -29197, -31164, -32365,
-32768, -32365, -31164, -29197, -26510, -23171, -19261, -14877, -10126, -5126 };
int i = 0;
int x1 = 0;
int x2 = 0;
float y = 0;
float sin1(float phase) {
x1 = (int) phase % 40;
if (x1 < 0) x1 += 40;
x2 = (x1 + 1) % 40;
y = (sine_table[x2] - sine_table[x1])
* ((float) ((int) (40 * 0.001 * i * 100) % 4100) / 100 - x1)
+ sine_table[x1];
return y;
}
int main(void) {
double pi = 3.1415926535897932384626433832795;
for (int j = 0; j < 1000; j++) {
float x = 40 * 0.001 * i;
float radians = x * 2 * pi / 40;
printf("%f %f %f\n", x, sin1(x) / 32768, sin(radians));
i = i + 1;
}
}
Output
OP's Reference sin()
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
0.040000 0.006256 0.006283
0.080000 0.012512 0.012566
...
1.960000 0.301361 0.303035
2.000000 0.308990 0.309017
2.040000 0.314790 0.314987
...
39.880001 -0.020336 -0.018848
39.919998 -0.014079 -0.012567
39.959999 -0.006257 -0.006283
Better code would not pass the values i, x1, x2, y
as global variables, but as function parameters or function variables. Perhaps that is an artifact of OP's debugging.
Does anybody have a better idea to implement a sine generator in C?
This is quite broad. Better as in speed, precision, code space, portability, or maintainability? sine()
functions are easy to make. High-quality ones take more effort.
Although fuzzy, OP's use of a small look-up table is a good beginning - although I see it can be done without any floating point math. I recommend for OP to construct a tested and working solution and post it in Code Review for improvement ideas.