I have a code which uses bit-fields declared as follows
typedef struct my{
const char *name;
uint8_t is_alpha : 1;
uint8_t is_hwaccel : 1;
uint8_t x_chroma_shift;
uint8_t y_chroma_shift;
} mystr;
uint8_t
is typedef'ed to unsigned char
.
Building the code in MS-VS 2008 using this bit fields gives a warning as below:
imgconvert.c(60) : warning C4214: nonstandard extension used : bit-field types other than int.
1] Is there any problems/potential issues in using bit fields of type other than int? Why the warning?
Since bit-fields are low-level, there may be issues with portability if you are using non-standard types. Hence the warning -- note it is still a warning and not an error.
2] Are other than int type bit-fileds they allowed by C99 C language specification?
From the draft of C99:
6.7.2.1 Structure and union specifiers
4 A bit-field shall have a type that is a qualified or unqualified version of _Bool, signed int, unsigned int, or some other implementation-defined type.