While I was working on this question, I've come across a possible idea that uses ptrace
, but I'm unable to get a proper understanding of how ptrace
interacts with threads.
Suppose I have a given, multithreaded main process, and I want to attach to a specific thread in it (perhaps from a forked child).
Can I attach to a specific thread? (The manuals diverge on this question.)
If so, does that mean that single-stepping only steps through that one thread's instructions? Does it stop all the process's threads?
If so, do all the other threads remain stopped while I call PTRACE_SYSCALL
or PTRACE_SINGLESTEP
, or do all threads continue? Is there a way to step forward only in one single thread but guarantee that the other threads remain stopped?
Basically, I want to synchronise the original program by forcing all threads to stop, and then only execute a small set of single-threaded instructions by single-stepping the one traced thread.
My personal attempts so far look a bit like this:
pid_t target = syscall(SYS_gettid); // get the calling thread's ID
pid_t pid = fork();
if (pid > 0)
{
waitpid(pid, NULL, 0); // synchronise main process
important_instruction();
}
else if (pid == 0)
{
ptrace(target, PTRACE_ATTACH, NULL, NULL); // does this work?
// cancel parent's "waitpid" call, e.g. with a signal
// single-step to execute "important_instruction()" above
ptrace(target, PTRACE_DETACH, NULL, NULL); // parent's threads resume?
_Exit(0);
}
However, I'm not sure, and can't find suitable references, that this is concurrently-correct and that important_instruction()
is guaranteed to be executed only when all other threads are stopped. I also understand that there may be race conditions when the parent receives signals from elsewhere, and I heard that I should use PTRACE_SEIZE
instead, but that doesn't seem to exist everywhere.
Any clarification or references would be greatly appreciated!
I wrote a second test case. I had to add a separate answer, since it was too long to fit into the first one with example output included.
First, here is tracer.c
:
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/ptrace.h>
#include <sys/prctl.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <sys/user.h>
#include <dirent.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#ifndef SINGLESTEPS
#define SINGLESTEPS 10
#endif
/* Similar to getline(), except gets process pid task IDs.
* Returns positive (number of TIDs in list) if success,
* otherwise 0 with errno set. */
size_t get_tids(pid_t **const listptr, size_t *const sizeptr, const pid_t pid)
{
char dirname[64];
DIR *dir;
pid_t *list;
size_t size, used = 0;
if (!listptr || !sizeptr || pid < (pid_t)1) {
errno = EINVAL;
return (size_t)0;
}
if (*sizeptr > 0) {
list = *listptr;
size = *sizeptr;
} else {
list = *listptr = NULL;
size = *sizeptr = 0;
}
if (snprintf(dirname, sizeof dirname, "/proc/%d/task/", (int)pid) >= (int)sizeof dirname) {
errno = ENOTSUP;
return (size_t)0;
}
dir = opendir(dirname);
if (!dir) {
errno = ESRCH;
return (size_t)0;
}
while (1) {
struct dirent *ent;
int value;
char dummy;
errno = 0;
ent = readdir(dir);
if (!ent)
break;
/* Parse TIDs. Ignore non-numeric entries. */
if (sscanf(ent->d_name, "%d%c", &value, &dummy) != 1)
continue;
/* Ignore obviously invalid entries. */
if (value < 1)
continue;
/* Make sure there is room for another TID. */
if (used >= size) {
size = (used | 127) + 128;
list = realloc(list, size * sizeof list[0]);
if (!list) {
closedir(dir);
errno = ENOMEM;
return (size_t)0;
}
*listptr = list;
*sizeptr = size;
}
/* Add to list. */
list[used++] = (pid_t)value;
}
if (errno) {
const int saved_errno = errno;
closedir(dir);
errno = saved_errno;
return (size_t)0;
}
if (closedir(dir)) {
errno = EIO;
return (size_t)0;
}
/* None? */
if (used < 1) {
errno = ESRCH;
return (size_t)0;
}
/* Make sure there is room for a terminating (pid_t)0. */
if (used >= size) {
size = used + 1;
list = realloc(list, size * sizeof list[0]);
if (!list) {
errno = ENOMEM;
return (size_t)0;
}
*listptr = list;
*sizeptr = size;
}
/* Terminate list; done. */
list[used] = (pid_t)0;
errno = 0;
return used;
}
static int wait_process(const pid_t pid, int *const statusptr)
{
int status;
pid_t p;
do {
status = 0;
p = waitpid(pid, &status, WUNTRACED | WCONTINUED);
} while (p == (pid_t)-1 && errno == EINTR);
if (p != pid)
return errno = ESRCH;
if (statusptr)
*statusptr = status;
return errno = 0;
}
static int continue_process(const pid_t pid, int *const statusptr)
{
int status;
pid_t p;
do {
if (kill(pid, SIGCONT) == -1)
return errno = ESRCH;
do {
status = 0;
p = waitpid(pid, &status, WUNTRACED | WCONTINUED);
} while (p == (pid_t)-1 && errno == EINTR);
if (p != pid)
return errno = ESRCH;
} while (WIFSTOPPED(status));
if (statusptr)
*statusptr = status;
return errno = 0;
}
void show_registers(FILE *const out, pid_t tid, const char *const note)
{
struct user_regs_struct regs;
long r;
do {
r = ptrace(PTRACE_GETREGS, tid, ®s, ®s);
} while (r == -1L && errno == ESRCH);
if (r == -1L)
return;
#if (defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__i386__)) && __WORDSIZE == 64
if (note && *note)
fprintf(out, "Task %d: RIP=0x%016lx, RSP=0x%016lx. %s\n", (int)tid, regs.rip, regs.rsp, note);
else
fprintf(out, "Task %d: RIP=0x%016lx, RSP=0x%016lx.\n", (int)tid, regs.rip, regs.rsp);
#elif (defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__i386__)) && __WORDSIZE == 32
if (note && *note)
fprintf(out, "Task %d: EIP=0x%08lx, ESP=0x%08lx. %s\n", (int)tid, regs.eip, regs.esp, note);
else
fprintf(out, "Task %d: EIP=0x%08lx, ESP=0x%08lx.\n", (int)tid, regs.eip, regs.esp);
#endif
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
pid_t *tid = 0;
size_t tids = 0;
size_t tids_max = 0;
size_t t, s;
long r;
pid_t child;
int status;
if (argc < 2 || !strcmp(argv[1], "-h") || !strcmp(argv[1], "--help")) {
fprintf(stderr, "\n");
fprintf(stderr, "Usage: %s [ -h | --help ]\n", argv[0]);
fprintf(stderr, " %s COMMAND [ ARGS ... ]\n", argv[0]);
fprintf(stderr, "\n");
fprintf(stderr, "This program executes COMMAND in a child process,\n");
fprintf(stderr, "and waits for it to stop (via a SIGSTOP signal).\n");
fprintf(stderr, "When that occurs, the register state of each thread\n");
fprintf(stderr, "is dumped to standard output, then the child process\n");
fprintf(stderr, "is sent a SIGCONT signal.\n");
fprintf(stderr, "\n");
return 1;
}
child = fork();
if (child == (pid_t)-1) {
fprintf(stderr, "fork() failed: %s.\n", strerror(errno));
return 1;
}
if (!child) {
prctl(PR_SET_DUMPABLE, (long)1);
prctl(PR_SET_PTRACER, (long)getppid());
fflush(stdout);
fflush(stderr);
execvp(argv[1], argv + 1);
fprintf(stderr, "%s: %s.\n", argv[1], strerror(errno));
return 127;
}
fprintf(stderr, "Tracer: Waiting for child (pid %d) events.\n\n", (int)child);
fflush(stderr);
while (1) {
/* Wait for a child event. */
if (wait_process(child, &status))
break;
/* Exited? */
if (WIFEXITED(status) || WIFSIGNALED(status)) {
errno = 0;
break;
}
/* At this point, only stopped events are interesting. */
if (!WIFSTOPPED(status))
continue;
/* Obtain task IDs. */
tids = get_tids(&tid, &tids_max, child);
if (!tids)
break;
printf("Process %d has %d tasks,", (int)child, (int)tids);
fflush(stdout);
/* Attach to all tasks. */
for (t = 0; t < tids; t++) {
do {
r = ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, tid[t], (void *)0, (void *)0);
} while (r == -1L && (errno == EBUSY || errno == EFAULT || errno == ESRCH));
if (r == -1L) {
const int saved_errno = errno;
while (t-->0)
do {
r = ptrace(PTRACE_DETACH, tid[t], (void *)0, (void *)0);
} while (r == -1L && (errno == EBUSY || errno == EFAULT || errno == ESRCH));
tids = 0;
errno = saved_errno;
break;
}
}
if (!tids) {
const int saved_errno = errno;
if (continue_process(child, &status))
break;
printf(" failed to attach (%s).\n", strerror(saved_errno));
fflush(stdout);
if (WIFCONTINUED(status))
continue;
errno = 0;
break;
}
printf(" attached to all.\n\n");
fflush(stdout);
/* Dump the registers of each task. */
for (t = 0; t < tids; t++)
show_registers(stdout, tid[t], "");
printf("\n");
fflush(stdout);
for (s = 0; s < SINGLESTEPS; s++) {
do {
r = ptrace(PTRACE_SINGLESTEP, tid[tids-1], (void *)0, (void *)0);
} while (r == -1L && errno == ESRCH);
if (!r) {
for (t = 0; t < tids - 1; t++)
show_registers(stdout, tid[t], "");
show_registers(stdout, tid[tids-1], "Advanced by one step.");
printf("\n");
fflush(stdout);
} else {
fprintf(stderr, "Single-step failed: %s.\n", strerror(errno));
fflush(stderr);
}
}
/* Detach from all tasks. */
for (t = 0; t < tids; t++)
do {
r = ptrace(PTRACE_DETACH, tid[t], (void *)0, (void *)0);
} while (r == -1 && (errno == EBUSY || errno == EFAULT || errno == ESRCH));
tids = 0;
if (continue_process(child, &status))
break;
if (WIFCONTINUED(status)) {
printf("Detached. Waiting for new stop events.\n\n");
fflush(stdout);
continue;
}
errno = 0;
break;
}
if (errno)
fprintf(stderr, "Tracer: Child lost (%s)\n", strerror(errno));
else
if (WIFEXITED(status))
fprintf(stderr, "Tracer: Child exited (%d)\n", WEXITSTATUS(status));
else
if (WIFSIGNALED(status))
fprintf(stderr, "Tracer: Child died from signal %d\n", WTERMSIG(status));
else
fprintf(stderr, "Tracer: Child vanished\n");
fflush(stderr);
return status;
}
tracer.c
executes the specified command, waiting for the command to receive a SIGSTOP
signal. (tracer.c
does not send it itself; you can either have the tracee stop itself, or send the signal externally.)
When the command has stopped, tracer.c
attaches a ptrace to every thread, and single-steps one of the threads a fixed number of steps (SINGLESTEPS
compile-time constant), showing the pertinent register state for each thread.
After that, it detaches from the command, and sends it a SIGCONT
signal to let it continue its operation normally.
Here is a simple test program, worker.c
, I used for testing:
#include <pthread.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#ifndef THREADS
#define THREADS 2
#endif
volatile sig_atomic_t done = 0;
void catch_done(int signum)
{
done = signum;
}
int install_done(const int signum)
{
struct sigaction act;
sigemptyset(&act.sa_mask);
act.sa_handler = catch_done;
act.sa_flags = 0;
if (sigaction(signum, &act, NULL))
return errno;
else
return 0;
}
void *worker(void *data)
{
volatile unsigned long *const counter = data;
while (!done)
__sync_add_and_fetch(counter, 1UL);
return (void *)(unsigned long)__sync_or_and_fetch(counter, 0UL);
}
int main(void)
{
unsigned long counter = 0UL;
pthread_t thread[THREADS];
pthread_attr_t attrs;
size_t i;
if (install_done(SIGHUP) ||
install_done(SIGTERM) ||
install_done(SIGUSR1)) {
fprintf(stderr, "Worker: Cannot install signal handlers: %s.\n", strerror(errno));
return 1;
}
pthread_attr_init(&attrs);
pthread_attr_setstacksize(&attrs, 65536);
for (i = 0; i < THREADS; i++)
if (pthread_create(&thread[i], &attrs, worker, &counter)) {
done = 1;
fprintf(stderr, "Worker: Cannot create thread: %s.\n", strerror(errno));
return 1;
}
pthread_attr_destroy(&attrs);
/* Let the original thread also do the worker dance. */
worker(&counter);
for (i = 0; i < THREADS; i++)
pthread_join(thread[i], NULL);
return 0;
}
Compile both using e.g.
gcc -W -Wall -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer worker.c -pthread -o worker
gcc -W -Wall -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer tracer.c -o tracer
and run either in a separate terminal, or on the background, using e.g.
./tracer ./worker &
The tracer shows the PID of the worker:
Tracer: Waiting for child (pid 24275) events.
At this point, the child is running normally. The action starts when you send a SIGSTOP
to the child. The tracer detects it, does the desired tracing, then detaches and lets the child continue normally:
kill -STOP 24275
Process 24275 has 3 tasks, attached to all.
Task 24275: RIP=0x0000000000400a5d, RSP=0x00007fff6895c428.
Task 24276: RIP=0x0000000000400a5d, RSP=0x00007f399cfb7ee8.
Task 24277: RIP=0x0000000000400a5d, RSP=0x00007f399cfa6ee8.
Task 24275: RIP=0x0000000000400a5d, RSP=0x00007fff6895c428.
Task 24276: RIP=0x0000000000400a5d, RSP=0x00007f399cfb7ee8.
Task 24277: RIP=0x0000000000400a5d, RSP=0x00007f399cfa6ee8. Advanced by one step.
Task 24275: RIP=0x0000000000400a5d, RSP=0x00007fff6895c428.
Task 24276: RIP=0x0000000000400a5d, RSP=0x00007f399cfb7ee8.
Task 24277: RIP=0x0000000000400a63, RSP=0x00007f399cfa6ee8. Advanced by one step.
Task 24275: RIP=0x0000000000400a5d, RSP=0x00007fff6895c428.
Task 24276: RIP=0x0000000000400a5d, RSP=0x00007f399cfb7ee8.
Task 24277: RIP=0x0000000000400a65, RSP=0x00007f399cfa6ee8. Advanced by one step.
Task 24275: RIP=0x0000000000400a5d, RSP=0x00007fff6895c428.
Task 24276: RIP=0x0000000000400a5d, RSP=0x00007f399cfb7ee8.
Task 24277: RIP=0x0000000000400a58, RSP=0x00007f399cfa6ee8. Advanced by one step.
Task 24275: RIP=0x0000000000400a5d, RSP=0x00007fff6895c428.
Task 24276: RIP=0x0000000000400a5d, RSP=0x00007f399cfb7ee8.
Task 24277: RIP=0x0000000000400a5d, RSP=0x00007f399cfa6ee8. Advanced by one step.
Task 24275: RIP=0x0000000000400a5d, RSP=0x00007fff6895c428.
Task 24276: RIP=0x0000000000400a5d, RSP=0x00007f399cfb7ee8.
Task 24277: RIP=0x0000000000400a63, RSP=0x00007f399cfa6ee8. Advanced by one step.
Task 24275: RIP=0x0000000000400a5d, RSP=0x00007fff6895c428.
Task 24276: RIP=0x0000000000400a5d, RSP=0x00007f399cfb7ee8.
Task 24277: RIP=0x0000000000400a65, RSP=0x00007f399cfa6ee8. Advanced by one step.
Task 24275: RIP=0x0000000000400a5d, RSP=0x00007fff6895c428.
Task 24276: RIP=0x0000000000400a5d, RSP=0x00007f399cfb7ee8.
Task 24277: RIP=0x0000000000400a58, RSP=0x00007f399cfa6ee8. Advanced by one step.
Task 24275: RIP=0x0000000000400a5d, RSP=0x00007fff6895c428.
Task 24276: RIP=0x0000000000400a5d, RSP=0x00007f399cfb7ee8.
Task 24277: RIP=0x0000000000400a5d, RSP=0x00007f399cfa6ee8. Advanced by one step.
Task 24275: RIP=0x0000000000400a5d, RSP=0x00007fff6895c428.
Task 24276: RIP=0x0000000000400a5d, RSP=0x00007f399cfb7ee8.
Task 24277: RIP=0x0000000000400a63, RSP=0x00007f399cfa6ee8. Advanced by one step.
Detached. Waiting for new stop events.
You can repeat the above as many times as you wish. Note that I picked the SIGSTOP
signal as the trigger, because this way tracer.c
is also useful as a basis for generating complex multithreaded core dumps per request (as the multithreaded process can simply trigger it by sending itself a SIGSTOP
).
The disassembly of the worker()
function the threads are all spinning in the above example:
0x400a50: eb 0b jmp 0x400a5d
0x400a52: 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 nopw 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
0x400a58: f0 48 83 07 01 lock addq $0x1,(%rdi) = fourth step
0x400a5d: 8b 05 00 00 00 00 mov 0x0(%rip),%eax = first step
0x400a63: 85 c0 test %eax,%eax = second step
0x400a65: 74 f1 je 0x400a58 = third step
0x400a67: 48 8b 07 mov (%rdi),%rax
0x400a6a: 48 89 c2 mov %rax,%rdx
0x400a6d: f0 48 0f b1 07 lock cmpxchg %rax,(%rdi)
0x400a72: 75 f6 jne 0x400a6a
0x400a74: 48 89 d0 mov %rdx,%rax
0x400a77: c3 retq
Now, this test program does only show how to stop a process, attach to all of its threads, single-step one of the threads a desired number of instructions, then letting all the threads continue normally; it does not yet prove that the same applies for letting specific threads continue normally (via PTRACE_CONT
). However, the detail I describe below indicates, to me, that the same approach should work fine for PTRACE_CONT
.
The main problem or surprise I encountered while writing the above test programs was the necessity of the
long r;
do {
r = ptrace(PTRACE_cmd, tid, ...);
} while (r == -1L && (errno == EBUSY || errno == EFAULT || errno == ESRCH));
loop, especially for the ESRCH
case (the others I only added due to the ptrace man page description).
You see, most ptrace commands are only allowed when the task is stopped. However, the task is not stopped when it is still completing e.g. a single-step command. Thus, using the above loop -- perhaps adding a millisecond nanosleep or similar to avoid wasting CPU -- makes sure the previous ptrace command has completed (and thus the task stopped) before we try to supply the new one.
Kerrek SB, I do believe at least some of the troubles you've had with your test programs are due to this issue? To me, personally, it was a kind of a D'oh! moment to realize that of course this is necessary, as ptracing is inherently asynchronous, not synchronous.
(This asynchronicity is also the cause for the SIGCONT
-PTRACE_CONT
interaction I mentioned above. I do believe with proper handling using the loop shown above, that interaction is no longer a problem -- and is actually quite understandable.)
Adding to the comments to this answer:
The Linux kernel uses a set of task state flags in the task_struct structure (see include/linux/sched.h
for definition) to keep track of the state of each task. The userspace-facing side of ptrace()
is defined in kernel/ptrace.c
.
When PTRACE_SINGLESTEP
or PTRACE_CONT
is called, kernel/ptrace.c
:ptrace_continue()
handles most of the details. It finishes by calling wake_up_state(child, __TASK_TRACED)
(kernel/sched/core.c::try_to_wake_up(child, __TASK_TRACED, 0)
).
When a process is stopped via SIGSTOP
signal, all tasks will be stopped, and end up in the "stopped, not traced" state.
Attaching to every task (via PTRACE_ATTACH or PTRACE_SEIZE, see kernel/ptrace.c
:ptrace_attach()
) modifies the task state. However, ptrace state bits (see include/linux/ptrace.h:PT_
constants) are separate from the task runnable state bits (see include/linux/sched.h:TASK_
constants).
After attaching to the tasks, and sending the process a SIGCONT
signal, the stopped state is not immediately modified (I believe), since the task is also being traced. Doing PTRACE_SINGLESTEP or PTRACE_CONT ends up in kernel/sched/core.c::try_to_wake_up(child, __TASK_TRACED, 0)
, which updates the task state, and moves the task to the run queue.
Now, the complicated part that I haven't yet found the code path, is how the task state gets updated in the kernel when the task is next scheduled. My tests indicate that with single-stepping (which is yet another task state flag), only the task state gets updated, with the single-step flag cleared. It seems that PTRACE_CONT is not as reliable; I believe it is because the single-step flag "forces" that task state change. Perhaps there is a "race condition" wrt. the continue signal delivery and state change?
(Further edit: the kernel developers definitely expect wait()
to be called, see for example this thread.)
In other words, after noticing that the process has stopped (note that you can use /proc/PID/stat
or /proc/PID/status
if the process is not a child, and not yet attached to), I believe the following procedure is the most robust one:
pid_t pid, p; /* Process owning the tasks */
tid_t *tid; /* Task ID array */
size_t tids; /* Tasks */
long result;
int status;
size_t i;
for (i = 0; i < tids; i++) {
while (1) {
result = ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, tid[i], (void *)0, (void *)0);
if (result == -1L && (errno == ESRCH || errno == EBUSY || errno == EFAULT || errno == EIO)) {
/* To avoid burning up CPU for nothing: */
sched_yield(); /* or nanosleep(), or usleep() */
continue;
}
break;
}
if (result == -1L) {
/*
* Fatal error. First detach from tid[0..i-1], then exit.
*/
}
}
/* Send SIGCONT to the process. */
if (kill(pid, SIGCONT)) {
/*
* Fatal error, see errno. Exit.
*/
}
/* Since we are attached to the process,
* we can wait() on it. */
while (1) {
errno = 0;
status = 0;
p = waitpid(pid, &status, WCONTINUED);
if (p == (pid_t)-1) {
if (errno == EINTR)
continue;
else
break;
} else
if (p != pid) {
errno = ESRCH;
break;
} else
if (WIFCONTINUED(status)) {
errno = 0;
break;
}
}
if (errno) {
/*
* Fatal error. First detach from tid[0..tids-1], then exit.
*/
}
/* Single-step each task to update the task states. */
for (i = 0; i < tids; i++) {
while (1) {
result = ptrace(PTRACE_SINGLESTEP, tid[i], (void *)0, (void *)0);
if (result == -1L && errno == ESRCH) {
/* To avoid burning up CPU for nothing: */
sched_yield(); /* or nanosleep(), or usleep() */
continue;
}
break;
}
if (result == -1L) {
/*
* Fatal error. First detach from tid[0..i-1], then exit.
*/
}
}
/* Obtain task register structures, to make sure the single-steps
* have completed and their states have stabilized. */
for (i = 0; i < tids; i++) {
struct user_regs_struct regs;
while (1) {
result = ptrace(PTRACE_GETREGS, tid[i], ®s, ®s);
if (result == -1L && (errno == ESRCH || errno == EBUSY || errno == EFAULT || errno == EIO)) {
/* To avoid burning up CPU for nothing: */
sched_yield(); /* or nanosleep(), or usleep() */
continue;
}
break;
}
if (result == -1L) {
/*
* Fatal error. First detach from tid[0..i-1], then exit.
*/
}
}
After the above, all tasks should be attached and in the expected state, so that e.g. PTRACE_CONT works without further tricks.
If the behaviour changes in future kernels -- I do believe the interaction between the STOP/CONT signals and ptracing is something that might change; at least a question to the LKML developers about this behaviour would be warranted! --, the above procedure will still work robustly. (Erring on the side of caution, by using a loop to PTRACE_SINGLESTEP a few times, might also be a good idea.)
The difference to PTRACE_CONT is that if the behaviour changes in the future, the initial PTRACE_CONT might actually continue the process, causing the ptrace()
that follow it to fail. With PTRACE_SINGLESTEP, the process will stop, allowing further ptrace()
calls to succeed.
Questions?