Signal handling with multiple threads in Linux

user500944 picture user500944 · Jul 27, 2012 · Viewed 69.9k times · Source

In Linux, what happens when a program (that possibly has multiple threads) receives a signal, like SIGTERM or SIGHUP?

Which thread intercepts the signal? Can multiple threads get the same signal? Is there a special thread dedicated entirely to handling signals? If not, what happens inside the thread that is to handle the signal? How does the execution resume after the signal handler routine finishes?

Answer

sarnold picture sarnold · Jul 27, 2012

pthreads(7) describes that POSIX.1 requires all threads in a process share attributes, including:

  • signal dispositions

POSIX.1 also requires some attributes to be distinct for each thread, including:

The Linux kernel's complete_signal routine has the following code block -- the comments are quite useful:

/*
 * Now find a thread we can wake up to take the signal off the queue.
 *
 * If the main thread wants the signal, it gets first crack.
 * Probably the least surprising to the average bear.
 */
if (wants_signal(sig, p))
        t = p;
else if (!group || thread_group_empty(p))
        /*
         * There is just one thread and it does not need to be woken.
         * It will dequeue unblocked signals before it runs again.
         */
        return;
else {
        /*
         * Otherwise try to find a suitable thread.
         */
        t = signal->curr_target;
        while (!wants_signal(sig, t)) {
                t = next_thread(t);
                if (t == signal->curr_target)
                        /*
                         * No thread needs to be woken.
                         * Any eligible threads will see
                         * the signal in the queue soon.
                         */
                        return;
        }
        signal->curr_target = t;
}

/*
 * Found a killable thread.  If the signal will be fatal,
 * then start taking the whole group down immediately.
 */
if (sig_fatal(p, sig) &&
    !(signal->flags & SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT) &&
    !sigismember(&t->real_blocked, sig) &&
    (sig == SIGKILL || !p->ptrace)) {
        /*
         * This signal will be fatal to the whole group.
         */

So, you see that you are in charge of where signals are delivered:

If your process has set a signal's disposition to SIG_IGN or SIG_DFL, then the signal is ignored (or default -- kill, core, or ignore) for all threads.

If your process has set a signal's disposition to a specific handler routine, then you can control which thread will receive the signals by manipulating specific thread signal masks using pthread_sigmask(3). You can nominate one thread to manage them all, or create one thread per signal, or any mixture of these options for specific signals, or you rely on the Linux kernel's current default behavior of delivering the signal to the main thread.

Some signals, however, are special according to the signal(7) man page:

A signal may be generated (and thus pending) for a process as a whole (e.g., when sent using kill(2)) or for a specific thread (e.g., certain signals, such as SIGSEGV and SIGFPE, generated as a consequence of executing a specific machine-language instruction are thread directed, as are signals targeted at a specific thread using pthread_kill(3)). A process-directed signal may be delivered to any one of the threads that does not currently have the signal blocked. If more than one of the threads has the signal unblocked, then the kernel chooses an arbitrary thread to which to deliver the signal.