What is the difference between QString::number(0)
and ((const char*) 0)
?
I want to initialize a QString
say phoneNumber
to null
. Will phoneNumber(QString::number(0))
and phoneNumber((const char*) 0)
both work?
To create a null QString
just default initialize it:
QString phoneNumber;
// or if you already have a QString variable and want to 'clear' it:
phoneNumber = QString();
Note that QString::number(0)
is decidedly not null - it creates a QString with the value "0"
.
You could also initialize the QString
with a NULL
pointer, but I wouldn't recommend it unless you're passing a pointer regardless of whether it's NULL
or not (i.e., it could sometimes point to a C string) since it's unnecessary.
You should also understand the following Qt docs:
Distinction Between Null and Empty Strings
For historical reasons,
QString
distinguishes between a null string and an empty string. A null string is a string that is initialized usingQString
's default constructor or by passing(const char *)0
to the constructor. An empty string is any string with size 0. A null string is always empty, but an empty string isn't necessarily null:QString().isNull(); // returns true QString().isEmpty(); // returns true QString("").isNull(); // returns false QString("").isEmpty(); // returns true QString("abc").isNull(); // returns false QString("abc").isEmpty(); // returns false
All functions except
isNull()
treat null strings the same as empty strings. For example,toAscii().constData()
returns a pointer to a'\0'
character for a null string (not a null pointer), andQString()
compares equal toQString("")
. We recommend that you always use theisEmpty()
function and avoidisNull()
.