Is pointer assignment atomic in C++?

c++ multithreading pointers variable-assignment atomicity
fbrereto picture fbrereto · Jan 19, 2012 · Viewed 7.6k times · Source

I've actually heard claims both ways. I suspect they are not, but I wanted to get the topic settled.

Answer

Grizzly picture Grizzly · Jan 19, 2012

C++03 does not know about the existance of threads, therefore the concept of atomicity doesn't make much sense for C++03, meaning that it doesn't say anything about that.

C++11 does know about threads, but once again doesn't say anything about the atomicity of assigning pointers. However C++11 does contain std::atomic<T*>, which is guaranteed to be atomic.

Note that even if writing to a raw pointer is atomic on your platform the compiler is still free to move that assingment around, so that doesn't really buy you anything.

If you need to write to a pointer which is shared between threads use either std::atomic<T*> (or the not yet official boost::atomic<T*>, gccs atomic intrinsics or windows Interlocked*) or wrap all accesses to that pointer in mutexes.

Related questions

Simple example of threading in C++

Can someone post a simple example of starting two (Object Oriented) threads in C++. I'm looking for actual C++ thread objects that I can extend run methods on (or something similar) as opposed to calling a C-style thread library. I …

Read More
Start thread with member function

I am trying to construct a std::thread with a member function that takes no arguments and returns void. I can't figure out any syntax that works - the compiler complains no matter what. What is the correct way to …

Read More
Mutex example / tutorial?

I'm new to multithreading, and was trying to understand how mutexes work. Did a lot of Googling but it still left some doubts of how it works because I created my own program in which locking didn't work. One absolutely …

Read More