Long Vs. Int C/C++ - What's The Point?

c++ c integer long-integer
MGZero picture MGZero · Sep 17, 2011 · Viewed 75.5k times · Source

As I've learned recently, a long in C/C++ is the same length as an int. To put it simply, why? It seems almost pointless to even include the datatype in the language. Does it have any uses specific to it that an int doesn't have? I know we can declare a 64-bit int like so:

long long x = 0;

But why does the language choose to do it this way, rather than just making a long well...longer than an int? Other languages such as C# do this, so why not C/C++?

Answer

Griwes picture Griwes · Sep 17, 2011

When writing in C or C++, every datatype is architecture and compiler specific. On one system int is 32, but you can find ones where it is 16 or 64; it's not defined, so it's up to compiler.

As for long and int, it comes from times, where standard integer was 16bit, where long was 32 bit integer - and it indeed was longer than int.

Related questions

Definition of int64_t

I am new to C/C++, so I have a couple of questions about a basic type: a) Can you explain to me the difference between int64_t and long (long int)? In my understanding, both are 64 bit integers. Is …

Read More
Check value of least significant bit (LSB) and most significant bit (MSB) in C/C++

I need to check the value of the least significant bit (LSB) and most significant bit (MSB) of an integer in C/C++. How would I do this?

Read More
performance of unsigned vs signed integers

Is there any performance gain/loss by using unsigned integers over signed integers? If so, does this goes for short and long as well?

Read More