Exotic architectures the standards committees care about

c++ c architecture

Yakov Galka · Aug 7, 2011 · Viewed 13.1k times · Source

I know that the C and C++ standards leave many aspects of the language implementation-defined just because if there is an architecture with other characteristics, it would be very difficult or impossible to write a standard conforming compiler for it.

I know that 40 years ago any computer had its own unique specification. However, I don't know of any architectures used today where:

CHAR_BIT != 8
signed is not two's complement (I heard Java had problems with this one).
Floating point is not IEEE 754 compliant (Edit: I meant "not in IEEE 754 binary encoding").

The reason I'm asking is that I often explain to people that it's good that C++ doesn't mandate any other low-level aspects like fixed sized types^†. It's good because unlike 'other languages' it makes your code portable when used correctly (Edit: because it can be ported to more architectures without requiring emulation of low-level aspects of the machine, like e.g. two's complement arithmetic on sign+magnitude architecture). But I feel bad that I cannot point to any specific architecture myself.

So the question is: what architectures exhibit the above properties?

† uint*_ts are optional.