Template within template: why "`>>' should be `> >' within a nested template argument list"

c++ templates compiler-construction vector lexicographic
zw324 picture zw324 · Jul 14, 2011 · Viewed 39.1k times · Source

I know that when we are using template inside another template, we should write it like this:

vector<pair<int,int> > s;

and if we write it without the whitespace:

vector<pair<int,int>> s;

we will get an error:

`>>' should be `> >' within a nested template argument list

I see this is understandable, but I just can't help but wondering, in which cases will this be really ambiguous?

Answer

Johannes Schaub - litb picture Johannes Schaub - litb · Jul 14, 2011

Sometimes you want it to be >>. Consider

boost::array<int, 1024>>2> x;

In C++03 this successfully parses and creates an array of size 256.

Related questions

Why can templates only be implemented in the header file?

Quote from The C++ standard library: a tutorial and handbook: The only portable way of using templates at the moment is to implement them in header files by using inline functions. Why is this? (Clarification: header files are not the …

Read More
Storing C++ template function definitions in a .CPP file

I have some template code that I would prefer to have stored in a CPP file instead of inline in the header. I know this can be done as long as you know which template types will be used. For …

Read More
Use 'class' or 'typename' for template parameters?

Possible Duplicate: C++ difference of keywords ‘typename’ and ‘class’ in templates When defining a function template or class template in C++, one can write this: template <class T> ... or one can write this: template <typename T> ... …

Read More