I wasn't aware of the std::atomic
variables but was aware about the std::mutex
(weird right!) provided by the standard; however one thing caught my eye: there are two seemingly-same (to me) atomic types provided by the standard, listed below:
The std::atomic_flag
contains the following explanation:
std::atomic_flag
is an atomic boolean type. Unlike all specializations ofstd::atomic
, it is guaranteed to be lock-free. Unlikestd::atomic<bool>
,std::atomic_flag
does not provide load or store operations.
which I fail to understand. Is std::atomic<bool>
not guaranteed to be lock-free? Then it's not atomic or what?
So what's the difference between the two and when should I use which?
std::atomic bool type not guranteed to be lock-free?
Correct. std::atomic
may be implemented using locks.
then it's not atomic or what?
std::atomic
is atomic whether it has been implemented using locks, or without. std::atomic_flag
is guaranteed to be implemented without using locks.
So what's the difference b/w two
The primary difference besides the lock-free guarantee is:
std::atomic_flag
does not provide load or store operations.
and when should I use which?
Usually, you will want to use std::atomic<bool>
when you need an atomic boolean variable. std::atomic_flag
is a low level structure that can be used to implement custom atomic structures.