In C++03, an expression is either an rvalue or an lvalue.
In C++11, an expression can be an:
Two categories have become five categories.
I guess this document might serve as a not so short introduction : n3055
The whole massacre began with the move semantics. Once we have expressions that can be moved and not copied, suddenly easy to grasp rules demanded distinction between expressions that can be moved, and in which direction.
From what I guess based on the draft, the r/l value distinction stays the same, only in the context of moving things get messy.
Are they needed? Probably not if we wish to forfeit the new features. But to allow better optimization we should probably embrace them.
Quoting n3055:
E
is an
expression of pointer type, then *E
is an lvalue expression referring to
the object or function to which E
points. As another example, the
result of calling a function whose
return type is an lvalue reference is
an lvalue.] The document in question is a great reference for this question, because it shows the exact changes in the standard that have happened as a result of the introduction of the new nomenclature.