Let's say I have some kind of collection and I obtained an iterator for the beginning of it. Now let's say I modified the collection. Can I still use the iterator safely, regardless of the type of the collection or the iterator?
To avoid confusion, here is the order of operations I talk about:
Depends on the container. e.g. if it's a vector
, after modifying the container all iterators can be invalidated. However, if it's a list
, the iterators irrelevant to the modified place will remain valid.
A vector's iterators are invalidated when its memory is reallocated. Additionally, inserting or deleting an element in the middle of a vector invalidates all iterators that point to elements following the insertion or deletion point. It follows that you can prevent a vector's iterators from being invalidated if you use
reserve()
to preallocate as much memory as the vector will ever use, and if all insertions and deletions are at the vector's end. [1]The semantics of iterator invalidation for
deque
is as follows.Insert
(includingpush_front
andpush_back
) invalidates all iterators that refer to adeque
.Erase
in the middle of adeque
invalidates all iterators that refer to thedeque
.Erase
at the beginning or end of adeque
(includingpop_front
andpop_back
) invalidates an iterator only if it points to the erased element. [2]
List
s have the important property that insertion and splicing do not invalidate iterators to list elements, and that even removal invalidates only the iterators that point to the elements that are removed. [3]
Map
has the important property that inserting a new element into amap
does not invalidate iterators that point to existing elements. Erasing an element from a map also does not invalidate any iterators, except, of course, for iterators that actually point to the element that is being erased. [4] (same forset
,multiset
andmultimap
)