I understand the lambda function and the purpose of it in c++ 11. But i do not understand the difference between "Capturing the value" and "Passing an argument". For Instance..
#include <iostream>
#include <functional>
using namespace std;
int add(int a,int b){
return a+b;
}
int main(int argc, char** argv){
function <int(int,int)> cppstyle;
cppstyle = add;
auto l = [] (function <int(int,int)> f,int a, int b) {return f(a,b);};
cout << l(cppstyle,10,30) <<"\n";
}
The output of the code above is same as the code below..
#include <iostream>
#include <functional>
using namespace std;
int add(int a,int b){
return a+b;
}
int main(int argc, char** argv){
function <int(int,int)> cppstyle;
cppstyle = add;
auto l = [cppstyle] (int a, int b) {return cppstyle(a,b);};
cout << l(10,30) <<"\n";
}
Is "capturing a value" similar to "passing a value as an argument"? or capture has some special meaning?
The difference between a captured argument and a passing argument could be seen with an analogy. Consider the following function object:
struct Capture {
int &i;
int const j;
public:
Capture(int &_i, int &_j) : i(_i), j(_j) {}
int operator()(int const a, int const b) {
i *= j;
return a * b;
}
};
In function object class Capture
there are two member variables i
and j
. There's also overloaded operator()
which takes two input arguments. Now consider the following lambda:
int i, j;
[&i, j](int const a, int const b) {
i *= j;
return a * b;
};
The member variables of class Capture
are in analogy with the lambda capture (i.e., [&i, j]
), whereas input arguments of overloaded operator()
a
and b
are in analogy with input arguments a
and b
of the lambda shown above.
That is, if you consider a lambda as a function object, its capture is the state of the function object (i.e., its member variables) whereas its input arguments would be the input arguments of the overloaded operator()
.