While compiling on GCC I get the error: pure-specifier on function-definition, but not when I compile the same code using VS2005.
class Dummy {
//error: pure-specifier on function-definition, VS2005 compiles
virtual void Process() = 0 {};
};
But when the definition of this pure virtual function is not inline, it works:
class Dummy
{
virtual void Process() = 0;
};
void Dummy::Process()
{} //compiles on both GCC and VS2005
What does the error means? Why cannot I do it inline? Is it legal to evade the compile issue as shown in the second code sample?
Ok, I've just learned something. A pure virtual function must be declared as follows:
class Abstract
{
public:
virtual void pure_virtual() = 0;
};
It may have a body, although it is illegal to include it at the point of declaration. This means that to have a body the pure virtual function must be defined outside the class. Note that even if it has a body, the function must still be overridden by any concrete classes derived from Abstract
. They would just have an option to call Abstract::pure_virtual()
explicitly if they need to.
The details are here.