Assuming I have this pseudo-code:
bool conditionA = executeStepA();
if (conditionA){
bool conditionB = executeStepB();
if (conditionB){
bool conditionC = executeStepC();
if (conditionC){
...
}
}
}
executeThisFunctionInAnyCase();
Functions executeStepX
should be executed if and only if the previous succeed.
In any case, the executeThisFunctionInAnyCase
function should be called at the end.
I'm a newbie in programming, so sorry for the very basic question: is there a way (in C/C++ for example) to avoid that long if
chain producing that sort of "pyramid of code", at the expense of the code legibility?
I know that if we could skip the executeThisFunctionInAnyCase
function call, the code could be simplified as:
bool conditionA = executeStepA();
if (!conditionA) return;
bool conditionB = executeStepB();
if (!conditionB) return;
bool conditionC = executeStepC();
if (!conditionC) return;
But the constraint is the executeThisFunctionInAnyCase
function call.
Could the break
statement be used in some way?
You can use an &&
(logic AND):
if (executeStepA() && executeStepB() && executeStepC()){
...
}
executeThisFunctionInAnyCase();
this will satisfy both of your requirements:
executeStep<X>()
should evaluate only if the previous one succeeded (this is called short circuit evaluation)executeThisFunctionInAnyCase()
will be executed in any case