Can C++ struct have member functions?
I was pretty confused about the difference between struct and class as I seemed to see them used for pretty much the same things. I googled the differences and the only answer I saw was that structs have public members by default and classes have private members by default. However, my lecturers have just told me that structs cannot contain member functions. But I have seen many threads on the internet where people include member functions in structs and specifically say that it is alright to do so.
My lecturers seem adamant that structs by definition cannot have functions, so what is going on? The only thing I could think of is that maybe the compiler changes functions within a struct to something else so that they technically don't contain functions... Is there a clear answer to these contradictions?
Answer
I googled the differences and the only answer I saw was that structs have public members by default and classes have private members by default.
Yes, this is correct. In addition, bases of a struct are inherited publicly by default, whereas bases of a class are inherited privately by default.
Declaring a function as a member of a struct has precisely the same semantics as declaring a function as a member of a class, except for the difference you've noted. In each case they are called member functions.