Is auto_ptr deprecated?

c++ standards smart-pointers auto-ptr unique-ptr
dimba picture dimba · Mar 8, 2010 · Viewed 41.9k times · Source
  1. Will auto_ptr be deprecated in incoming C++ standard?
  2. Should unique_ptr be used for ownership transfer instead of shared_ptr?
  3. If unique_ptr is not in the standard, then do I need to use shared_ptr instead?

Answer

David Rodríguez - dribeas picture David Rodríguez - dribeas · Mar 8, 2010

UPDATE: This answer was written in 2010 and as anticipated std::auto_ptr has been deprecated. The advice is entirely valid.

In C++0x std::auto_ptr will be deprecated in favor of std::unique_ptr. The choice of smart pointer will depend on your use case and your requirements, with std::unique_ptr with move semantics for single ownership that can be used inside containers (using move semantics) and std::shared_ptr when ownership is shared.

You should try to use the smart pointer that best fits the situation, choosing the correct pointer type provides other programmers with insight into your design.

Related questions

What are the rules about using an underscore in a C++ identifier?

It's common in C++ to name member variables with some kind of prefix to denote the fact that they're member variables, rather than local variables or parameters. If you've come from an MFC background, you'll probably use m_foo. I've …

Read More
What are the new features in C++17?

C++17 is now feature complete, so unlikely to experience large changes. Hundreds of proposals were put forward for C++17. Which of those features were added to C++ in C++17? When using a C++ compiler that supports "C++1z", which of …

Read More
Why aren't variable-length arrays part of the C++ standard?

I haven't used C very much in the last few years. When I read this question today I came across some C syntax which I wasn't familiar with. Apparently in C99 the following syntax is valid: void foo(int n) { …

Read More