I wonder my code works perfectly fine either using strcmp
or simply ==
in C++ for comparing 2 char arrays. Can any one justify the reason of using strcmp
instead of ==
;
strcmp
compares the actual C-string
content, while using ==
between two C-string
is asking if these two char
pointers point to the same position.
If we have some C-string
defined as following:
char string_a[] = "foo";
char string_b[] = "foo";
char * string_c = string_a;
strcmp(string_a, string_b) == 0
would return true
, while string_a == string_b
would return false
. Only when "comparing" string_a
and string_c
using ==
would return true
.
If you want to compare the actual contents of two C-string
but not whether they are just alias of each other, use strcmp
.
For a side note: if you are using C++
instead of C
as your question tag shows, then you should use std::string
. For example,
std::string string_d = "bar";
std::string string_e = "bar";
then string_d == string_e
would return true
. string_d.compare(string_e)
would return 0
, which is the C++
version of strcmp
.