Consider:
struct str {};
str operator"" _X(long double d) {
return str();
}
This compiles fine with g++ 4.7.2 Wall std=c++11
but now if I give a double :
str operator"" _X(double d) {
return str();
}
I get the following error message: main.cpp|3|error: 'str operator"" _X(double)' has invalid argument list
What is the problem ? Has this something to do with "It is not possible to redefine the meaning of a built-in literal suffix" (Stroustrup FAQ) ? Can you think of a workaround ?
What is the problem?
The problem is that the Standard forbids it. Per paragraph 13.5.8./3 of the C++11 Standard on user-defined literals:
The declaration of a literal operator shall have a parameter-declaration-clause equivalent to one of the following:
const char* unsigned long long int long double char wchar_t char16_t char32_t const char*, std::size_t const wchar_t*, std::size_t const char16_t*, std::size_t const char32_t*, std::size_t
Concerning a workaround, I am not sure it is needed, since the following works fine (a double
gets implicitly converted to a long double
, so you can pass in literals of type double
):
struct str {};
str operator"" _X(long double d) {
return str();
}
int main()
{
str s = 4.0_X;
}