I have heard that C++ has something called "conversion constructors" or "converting constructors". What are these, and what are they for? I saw it mentioned with regards to this code:
class MyClass
{
public:
int a, b;
MyClass( int i ) {}
}
int main()
{
MyClass M = 1 ;
}
The definition for a converting constructor is different between C++03 and C++11. In both cases it must be a non-explicit
constructor (otherwise it wouldn't be involved in implicit conversions), but for C++03 it must also be callable with a single argument. That is:
struct foo
{
foo(int x); // 1
foo(char* s, int x = 0); // 2
foo(float f, int x); // 3
explicit foo(char x); // 4
};
Constructors 1 and 2 are both converting constructors in C++03 and C++11. Constructor 3, which must take two arguments, is only a converting constructor in C++11. The last, constructor 4, is not a converting constructor because it is explicit
.
C++03: §12.3.1
A constructor declared without the function-specifier
explicit
that can be called with a single parameter specifies a conversion from the type of its first parameter to the type of its class. Such a constructor is called a converting constructor.
C++11: §12.3.1
A constructor declared without the function-specifier
explicit
specifies a conversion from the types of its parameters to the type of its class. Such a constructor is called a converting constructor.
Why are constructors with more than a single parameter considered to be converting constructors in C++11? That is because the new standard provides us with some handy syntax for passing arguments and returning values using braced-init-lists. Consider the following example:
foo bar(foo f)
{
return {1.0f, 5};
}
The ability to specify the return value as a braced-init-list is considered to be a conversion. This uses the converting constructor for foo
that takes a float
and an int
. In addition, we can call this function by doing bar({2.5f, 10})
. This is also a conversion. Since they are conversions, it makes sense for the constructors they use to be converting constructors.
It is important to note, therefore, that making the constructor of foo
which takes a float
and an int
have the explicit
function specifier would stop the above code from compiling. The above new syntax can only be used if there is a converting constructor available to do the job.
C++11: §6.6.3:
A
return
statement with a braced-init-list initializes the object or reference to be returned from the function by copy-list-initialization (8.5.4) from the specified initializer list.
§8.5:
The initialization that occurs [...] in argument passing [...] is called copy-initialization.
§12.3.1:
An explicit constructor constructs objects just like non-explicit constructors, but does so only where the direct-initialization syntax (8.5) or where casts (5.2.9, 5.4) are explicitly used.