If you have a templated class or a templated function, (or combination of the two), how do you bind that function, (preserving the template type parameter)?
I was given some help about the basic syntax in a post below, to bind to functions with explicit template type parameters, but lose the ability to provide template type parameters in the process.
Is it possible to get this to work so that it is still possible to provide template type parameters with future calls?
Cleaned up this code a lot, but it obviously won't compile because I can't find the correct syntax, (are there any ways of doing this)?
Removed the "vector" requirement to simplify this:
Thanks for the help!
#include <functional>
#include <vector>
#include <string>
/***************************************/
template <typename CommandTemplateType>
class Storage
{
public:
// No idea how to define this vector to allow Template Parameters
// static std::vector<std::function<void<ParameterTemplateType>
// (std::shared_ptr<ParameterTemplateType>)>> Functions;
// I really don't need the collection, a single member would kick start my research:
static std::function<void<ParameterTemplateType>(std::shared_ptr<ParameterTemplateType>)> Function;
template <typename ParameterTemplateType>
static void Execute(ParameterTemplateType parameter)
{
// Look up index, or loop through all..
// I am trying to invoke the bound function with a template param:
// Functions[index]<ParameterTemplateType>(parameter);
// preferably, just:
Function<ParameterTempalteType>(parameter);
}
};
/***************************************/
template <typename TemplateType>
class MyClass
{
template <typename ParameterTemplateType>
void MyFunction(ParameterTemplateType myParameter)
{
// Do something;
}
MyClass()
{
std::string parameter = L"Test String";
// Do not know how to include the
// template<typename ParameterTemplateType> definition to bind call.
// Storage::Functions.push_back(
// std::bind(&MyClass::MyFunction<ParameterTemplateType>,
// this, std::placeholders::_1));
// Or just something like:
Storage::Function = std::bind(&MyClass::MyFunction<ParameterTemplateType>,
this, std::placeholders::_1));
/***************************************/
// Call the bound function with an explicit parameter somehow:
std::string parameter = L"Test String";
Storage::Execute<std::string>(parameter);
}
};
The key issues is that in C++11 you cannot do something like:
// Doesn't compile
template <typename TemplateType>
static std::function<void(std::shared_ptr<TemplateType>)> Function;
Classes and Functions can be templated, but not member properties.
The "Magic" is:
/*******************************************************************/
// Define a Function Pointer in a Container
class Storage
{
template <typename TemplateType>
struct FunctionContainer {
static std::function<void(std::shared_ptr<TemplateType>)> Function;
};
};
/*******************************************************************/
// Initialize FunctionContainer's Static Function Pointer if using static pointer.
template <typename TemplateType>
std::function<void(std::shared_ptr<TemplateType>)> Storage
::FunctionContainer<TemplateType>::Function;
You can then Bind a templated function to this function like:
// Bind Function Pointer in Container to a Local Function
class MyClass
{
template <typename TemplateType>
void MyFunction(std::shared_ptr<TemplateType> parameter)
{
// Do something.
// You can make this templated or non-templated.
}
MyClass()
{
// If you really want, you can templatize std::string in the following:
Storage::FunctionContainer<std::string>::Function
= std::bind(&MyFunction<std::string>, this, std::placeholders::_1);
}
}
And you can invoke all of this and provide a templated type parameter like so:
//Invocation
std::shared_ptr<std::string> parameter;
parameter->get() = "Hello World".
Storage::FunctionContainer<std::string>::Function(parameter);