C++: Safe to use longjmp and setjmp?

c++ linux exception gcc setjmp
jameszhao00 picture jameszhao00 · Sep 3, 2009 · Viewed 13.7k times · Source

Is it safe to use longjmp and setjmp in C++ on linux/gcc with regards to the following?

  1. Exception handling (I'm not implementing exception handling using longjmp/setjmp. I want to know what side effects longjmp/setjmp will have on standard exception handling)
  2. *this pointer
  3. Signals
  4. Smart pointers (boost's shared and intrusive pointers)
  5. Anything else you can think of.

Answer

Michael Burr picture Michael Burr · Sep 3, 2009

setjmp()/longjmp() completely subvert stack unwinding and therefore exception handling as well as RAII (destructors in general).

From 18.7/4 "Other runtime support" in the standard:

If any automatic objects would be destroyed by a thrown exception transferring control to another (destination) point in the program, then a call to longjmp(jbuf, val) at the throw point that transfers control to the same (destination) point has undefined behavior.

So the bottom line is that setjmp()/longjmp() do not play well in C++.

Related questions

Sleep for milliseconds

I know the POSIX sleep(x) function makes the program sleep for x seconds. Is there a function to make the program sleep for x milliseconds in C++?

Read More
usr/bin/ld: cannot find -l<nameOfTheLibrary>

I'm trying to compile my program and it returns this error : usr/bin/ld: cannot find -l<nameOfTheLibrary> in my makefile I use the command g++ and link to my library which is a symbolic link to my …

Read More
C++ IDE for Linux?

I want to expand my programming horizons to Linux. A good, dependable basic toolset is important, and what is more basic than an IDE? I could find these SO topics: Lightweight IDE for linux and What tools do you use …

Read More