Just a small query regarding shared_ptr
.
Is it a good practice to use shared_ptr
pointing to an array? For example,
shared_ptr<int> sp(new int[10]);
If not, then why not? One reason I am already aware of is one can not increment/decrement the shared_ptr
. Hence it can not be used like a normal pointer to an array.
With C++17, shared_ptr
can be used to manage a dynamically allocated array. The shared_ptr
template argument in this case must be T[N]
or T[]
. So you may write
shared_ptr<int[]> sp(new int[10]);
From n4659, [util.smartptr.shared.const]
template<class Y> explicit shared_ptr(Y* p);
Requires:
Y
shall be a complete type. The expressiondelete[] p
, whenT
is an array type, ordelete p
, whenT
is not an array type, shall have well-defined behavior, and shall not throw exceptions.
...
Remarks: WhenT
is an array type, this constructor shall not participate in overload resolution unless the expressiondelete[] p
is well-formed and eitherT
isU[N]
andY(*)[N]
is convertible toT*
, orT
isU[]
andY(*)[]
is convertible toT*
. ...
To support this, the member type element_type
is now defined as
using element_type = remove_extent_t<T>;
Array elements can be access using operator[]
element_type& operator[](ptrdiff_t i) const;
Requires:
get() != 0 && i >= 0
. IfT
isU[N]
,i < N
. ...
Remarks: WhenT
is not an array type, it is unspecified whether this member function is declared. If it is declared, it is unspecified what its return type is, except that the declaration (although not necessarily the definition) of the function shall be well formed.
Prior to C++17, shared_ptr
could not be used to manage dynamically allocated arrays. By default, shared_ptr
will call delete
on the managed object when no more references remain to it. However, when you allocate using new[]
you need to call delete[]
, and not delete
, to free the resource.
In order to correctly use shared_ptr
with an array, you must supply a custom deleter.
template< typename T >
struct array_deleter
{
void operator ()( T const * p)
{
delete[] p;
}
};
Create the shared_ptr as follows:
std::shared_ptr<int> sp(new int[10], array_deleter<int>());
Now shared_ptr
will correctly call delete[]
when destroying the managed object.
The custom deleter above may be replaced by
the std::default_delete
partial specialization for array types
std::shared_ptr<int> sp(new int[10], std::default_delete<int[]>());
a lambda expression
std::shared_ptr<int> sp(new int[10], [](int *p) { delete[] p; });
Also, unless you actually need share onwership of the managed object, a unique_ptr
is better suited for this task, since it has a partial specialization for array types.
std::unique_ptr<int[]> up(new int[10]); // this will correctly call delete[]
Another pre-C++17 alternative to the ones listed above was provided by the Library Fundamentals Technical Specification, which augmented shared_ptr
to allow it to work out of the box for the cases when it owns an array of objects. The current draft of the shared_ptr
changes slated for this TS can be found in N4082. These changes will be accessible via the std::experimental
namespace, and included in the <experimental/memory>
header. A few of the relevant changes to support shared_ptr
for arrays are:
— The definition of the member type element_type
changes
typedef T element_type;typedef typename remove_extent<T>::type element_type;
— Member operator[]
is being added
element_type& operator[](ptrdiff_t i) const noexcept;
— Unlike the unique_ptr
partial specialization for arrays, both shared_ptr<T[]>
and shared_ptr<T[N]>
will be valid and both will result in delete[]
being called on the managed array of objects.
template<class Y> explicit shared_ptr(Y* p);
Requires:
Y
shall be a complete type. The expressiondelete[] p
, whenT
is an array type, ordelete p
, whenT
is not an array type, shall be well-formed, shall have well defined behavior, and shall not throw exceptions. WhenT
isU[N]
,Y(*)[N]
shall be convertible toT*
; whenT
isU[]
,Y(*)[]
shall be convertible toT*
; otherwise,Y*
shall be convertible toT*
.