How to convert a UTC date & time to a time_t in C++?

Kit Fisto picture Kit Fisto · Sep 10, 2012 · Viewed 9.4k times · Source

I want to convert a UTC date & time given in numbers for year, month, day, etc. to a time_t. Some systems offer functions like mkgmtime or timegm for this purpose but that is not standard and does not exist on my Solaris system.

The only solution I have found so far involves setting the local time zone to UTC with setenv and then call mktime. However this approach is not thread-safe, slow, not portable and even generates a memory leak on my system.

I have also seen approaches that tried to determine the current UTC offset using gmtime and then adding that to the result of mktime. But as far as I have seen all those approaches had gaps. After all, the conversion from the local time to UTC is not unique.

What do you think is the best solution?

Answer

Kit Fisto picture Kit Fisto · Sep 10, 2012

I have decided to implement my own version of mkgmtime and it was easier than I thought.

const int SecondsPerMinute = 60;
const int SecondsPerHour = 3600;
const int SecondsPerDay = 86400;
const int DaysOfMonth[12] = {31, 28, 31, 30, 31, 30, 31, 31, 30, 31, 30, 31};

bool IsLeapYear(short year)
{
    if (year % 4 != 0) return false;
    if (year % 100 != 0) return true;
    return (year % 400) == 0;
}

time_t mkgmtime(short year, short month, short day, short hour, short minute, short second)
{
    time_t secs = 0;
    for (short y = 1970; y < year; ++y)
        secs += (IsLeapYear(y)? 366: 365) * SecondsPerDay;
    for (short m = 1; m < month; ++m) {
        secs += DaysOfMonth[m - 1] * SecondsPerDay;
        if (m == 2 && IsLeapYear(year)) secs += SecondsPerDay;
    }
    secs += (day - 1) * SecondsPerDay;
    secs += hour * SecondsPerHour;
    secs += minute * SecondsPerMinute;
    secs += second;
    return secs;
}

My main concern was that mkgmtime must be consistent with gmtime. Such that gmtime(mktime(t)) returns the original input values. Therefore I have compared the results for all multiples of 61 between 0 and MAX_INT for time_t and they are indeed equal (at least on my system). Therefore the above routine is correct.

This outcome also means that the C library does not take leap seconds into account, which is a bad thing in itself but good for my purpose. The two functions will stay consistent for a long time. To be absolutely sure, my Timestamp class that uses this function always performs a quick check on program start and proves the consistency for a couple of meaningful values.