C++: What does #pragma comment(lib, "XXX") actually do with "XXX"?
My background is C# but I have to maintain some legacy (MS) C++. In that codebase I stumpled across:
#pragma comment(lib, "OtherLib700.lib")
where 700 is some versioning. Besides the lib is a DLL with the same name.
I first thought that the program would be dependant upon the DLL but after removing it from the system the program still works. There exists a newer version of the DLL, though, which is named OtherLib900...
It seems as though the program 'included' the code of the lib so that it's no longer dependant upon the external DLL. (Or that the program 'automatically' uses the newer DLL...)
Which one is correct? Is there are way to further confirm that 'assumption'?
Answer
That pragma is used to link against the specified .lib file. This is an alternative to specifying the library in the external dependencies field in project settings.
Mostly, it's used to support different versions:
#ifdef USE_FIRST_VERSION
#pragma comment(lib, "vers1.lib")
#else
#pragma comment(lib, "vers2.lib")
#endif
When your application uses a dynamically-linked library, a lib file tells you information about what symbols are exported in the dll. So basically you only need the lib to compile & link, but you need the dll to run the program, as it contains all the binary code.
You say there's an associated dll, which usually indicates the lib file only contains linking info, and no code. You should get a run-time error if the associated dll was not found. You can check with MSVS if a different version of the dll was loaded or if it was loaded from a different place.