Why would a virtual function be private?

c++ private virtual-functions access-specifier overriding
liori picture liori · Jul 15, 2009 · Viewed 13k times · Source

I just spotted this in some code:

class Foo {
[...]
private:
    virtual void Bar() = 0;
[...]
}

Does this have any purpose?

(I am trying to port some code from VS to G++, and this caught my attention)

Answer

Greg Rogers picture Greg Rogers · Jul 15, 2009

See this Herb Sutter article as to why you'd want to do such a thing.

Related questions

What are access specifiers? Should I inherit with private, protected or public?

I am confused about the meaning of access modifiers with respect to inheritance. What is the difference between inheritance involving the private, protected and public keywords?

Read More
static constructors in C++? I need to initialize private static objects

I want to have a class with a private static data member (a vector that contains all the characters a-z). In java or C#, I can just make a "static constructor" that will run before I make any instances of …

Read More
How to access private data members outside the class without making "friend"s?

I have a class A as mentioned below:- class A{ int iData; }; I neither want to create member function nor inherit the above class A nor change the specifier of iData. My doubts:- How to access iData of …

Read More