Using catch without arguments

c# try-catch
petko_stankoski picture petko_stankoski · Nov 4, 2011 · Viewed 38.8k times · Source

What is the difference between:

catch
{
    MessageBox.Show("Error.");
}

and:

catch (Exception ex)
{
    MessageBox.Show("Error.");
    //we never use ex, so is it better to use catch without arguments?
}

Answer

Jon Skeet picture Jon Skeet · Nov 4, 2011

As of .NET 2, if you don't tweak the configuration? Nothing.

Before then, or with some config tweak I can't remember precisely, there was the possibility of an exception being thrown from unmanaged code which didn't get converted into an Exception-compatible object.

Note that there's another option in between, where you specify the type but no variable:

catch (Exception)
{
   ...
}

Personally I'd be very wary of catching an exception without even logging it. It may be required if you're calling a boneheaded API, but it's generally best avoided.

Related questions

How using try catch for exception handling is best practice

while maintaining my colleague's code from even someone who claims to be a senior developer, I often see the following code: try { //do something } catch { //Do nothing } or sometimes they write logging information to log files like following try catch …

Read More
Why catch and rethrow an exception in C#?

I'm looking at the article C# - Data Transfer Object on serializable DTOs. The article includes this piece of code: public static string SerializeDTO(DTO dto) { try { XmlSerializer xmlSer = new XmlSerializer(dto.GetType()); StringWriter sWriter = new StringWriter(); xmlSer.Serialize(sWriter, …

Read More
IsNumeric function in c#

I know it's possible to check whether the value of a text box or variable is numeric using try/catch statements, but IsNumeric is so much simpler. One of my current projects requires recovering values from text boxes. Unfortunately, it …

Read More