String vs. StringBuilder

c# .net performance
Kuvo picture Kuvo · Sep 16, 2008 · Viewed 203.7k times · Source

I understand the difference between String and StringBuilder (StringBuilder being mutable) but is there a large performance difference between the two?

The program I’m working on has a lot of case driven string appends (500+). Is using StringBuilder a better choice?

Answer

Jay Bazuzi picture Jay Bazuzi · Sep 16, 2008

Yes, the performance difference is significant. See the KB article "How to improve string concatenation performance in Visual C#".

I have always tried to code for clarity first, and then optimize for performance later. That's much easier than doing it the other way around! However, having seen the enormous performance difference in my applications between the two, I now think about it a little more carefully.

Luckily, it's relatively straightforward to run performance analysis on your code to see where you're spending the time, and then to modify it to use StringBuilder where needed.

Related questions

Best way to reverse a string

I've just had to write a string reverse function in C# 2.0 (i.e. LINQ not available) and came up with this: public string Reverse(string text) { char[] cArray = text.ToCharArray(); string reverse = String.Empty; for (int i = cArray.Length - 1; …

Read More
How to create a new object instance from a Type

One may not always know the Type of an object at compile-time, but may need to create an instance of the Type. How do you get a new object instance from a Type?

Read More
What's the fastest way to read a text file line-by-line?

I want to read a text file line by line. I wanted to know if I'm doing it as efficiently as possible within the .NET C# scope of things. This is what I'm trying so far: var filestream = new System.…

Read More