I've been trying this, but I can't seem to figure this out. I want to do this...
public abstract class SingletonType<TSingleton, TBaseClass> : TBaseClass
where TSingleton : TBaseClass, new()
where TBaseClass : class
{
static TSingleton _singleton;
public static TSingleton Singleton
=> _singleton ?? (_singleton = new TSingleton());
}
The plan was to use it like this which would sort of 'wrap' the singleton pattern around a base class...
public class SingletonFoo : SingletonType<SingletonFoo, Foo> {
}
However, I keep getting this
Cannot derive from 'TBaseClass' because it is a type parameter
Um... I thought types were exactly what you do derive from!
So what am I missing?
Note: This is, of course, a trivial example as it doesn't add anything helpful, but assume SingletonType
has a lot of other logic which isn't relative to the question, hence it was omitted to focus on the question at hand.
Generic types in C# are not C++ templates; remember, a generic type must work for all possible type arguments. A template need only work for the constructions you actually make.
This question is a duplicate; see my answer to
for more thoughts on this. Basically, the short answer is that the considerable costs do not outweigh the small benefits of the feature. If you don't like that answer, see my second answer:
And if you don't like that answer either, see the follow-up question: