Which one to use: Managed vs. NonManaged hashing algorithms

c# unmanaged hash managed
Xaqron picture Xaqron · Mar 17, 2011 · Viewed 7.7k times · Source

In a regular C# application which class to use for hashing: xxxManaged or xxx (i.e SHA1Managed vs SHA1) and why?

Answer

Reed Copsey picture Reed Copsey · Mar 17, 2011

The Non-managed hashes which end in ***Cng, ie SHA256Cng, will also have platform restrictions. They are quite a bit faster than the managed alternatives, but will fail at runtime on Windows XP, for example. If you know your program will always be run on Windows 7, Vista SP1, or 2008, however, they will generally perform quite a bit better than the managed versions, even with the native interop overhead.

If you're writing a general purpose program, the ***Managed classes will be easier to work with, as they will always work.

Related questions

What is managed or unmanaged code in programming?

I am using a specific command in in my C# code, which works well. However, it is said to misbehave in "unmanaged" code. What is managed or unmanaged code?

Read More
Possible to call C++ code from C#?

Is it possible to call C++ code, possibly compiled as a code library file (.dll), from within a .NET language such as C#? Specifically, C++ code such as the RakNet networking library.

Read More
What exactly are unmanaged resources?

I want to know about unmanaged resources. Can anyone please give me a basic idea?

Read More