Is there a reason for not being able to handle a generic variable by the type pattern? Please consider the code:
public static int CompareValues<T>(T left, T right)
{
switch (left)
{
case IComparable<T> comparableDif:
return comparableDif.CompareTo(right);
case System.Numerics.Complex c:
return c.Magnitude
.CompareTo(((System.Numerics.Complex)(object)right).Magnitude);
default:
throw new ArgumentException("unsupported type");
}
}
The first match on the IComparable interface is ok, but the second one does not compile. Why do I have to use this boxing workaround?
case object o when o is System.Numerics.Complex:
return ((System.Numerics.Complex)o).Magnitude
.CompareTo(((System.Numerics.Complex)(object)right).Magnitude);
This is a consequence of how pattern matching in C# 7.0 is defined: for your type pattern to compile, a cast from T
to Complex
would have to exist, but it does not. The C# team realized it was a mistake to require this, so this issue was fixed in C# 7.1.