There's no available method in IMemoryCache that allows to iterate through each cached item. My project is small, I don't want to use other options like Redis.
namepsace Microsoft.Extensions.Caching.Memory{
public static class CacheExtensions
{
public static object Get(this IMemoryCache cache, object key);
public static TItem Get<TItem>(this IMemoryCache cache, object key);
public static TItem GetOrCreate<TItem>(this IMemoryCache cache, object key, Func<ICacheEntry, TItem> factory);
[AsyncStateMachine(typeof(CacheExtensions.<GetOrCreateAsync>d__9<>))]
public static Task<TItem> GetOrCreateAsync<TItem>(this IMemoryCache cache, object key, Func<ICacheEntry, Task<TItem>> factory);
public static TItem Set<TItem>(this IMemoryCache cache, object key, TItem value);
public static TItem Set<TItem>(this IMemoryCache cache, object key, TItem value, DateTimeOffset absoluteExpiration);
public static TItem Set<TItem>(this IMemoryCache cache, object key, TItem value, TimeSpan absoluteExpirationRelativeToNow);
public static TItem Set<TItem>(this IMemoryCache cache, object key, TItem value, IChangeToken expirationToken);
public static TItem Set<TItem>(this IMemoryCache cache, object key, TItem value, MemoryCacheEntryOptions options);
public static bool TryGetValue<TItem>(this IMemoryCache cache, object key, out TItem value);
}
}
https://github.com/aspnet/Caching/blob/dev/src/Microsoft.Extensions.Caching.Memory/MemoryCache.cs
You should cache two type of items.
abc.xyz-{0}
. abc.xyz
Sample Code:
cache.Set("abc.xyz-name", name, TimeSpan.FromMinutes(30));
cache.Set("abc.xyz-lastname", lastname, TimeSpan.FromMinutes(30));
cache.Set("abc.xyz-birthday", birthday, TimeSpan.FromMinutes(30));
cache.Set("abc.xyz", new List<string> { "abc.xyz-name", "abc.xyz-lastname", "abc.xyz-birthday" }, TimeSpan.FromMinutes(30));
and when deleting:
var keys = cache.Get<List<string>>("abc.xyz");
foreach(var key in keys)
cache.Remove(key);
cache.remove("abc.xyz");
Most of the services use IDistributedCache
(in your case MemoryDistributedCache
when registered - which again injects IMemoryCache
which is MemoryCache
class).
In a distributed cache you can't iterate over all keys as there are potentially millions of keys and this would significantly reduce the performance of the cached service if you could/would iterate over it.
So the above solution is also friendly and ready for the case when you replace your memory cache with a distributed cache, such as Redis.