In Scala there is a Promise class that could be used to complete a Future manually. I am looking for an alternative in C#.
I am writing a test and I want it to look it similar to this:
// var MyResult has a field `Header`
var promise = new Promise<MyResult>;
handlerMyEventsWithHandler( msg =>
promise.Complete(msg);
);
// Wait for 2 seconds
var myResult = promise.Future.Await(2000);
Assert.Equals("my header", myResult.Header);
I understand that this is probably not the right pattern for C#, but I couldn't figure out a reasonable way to achieve the same thing even with somewhat different pattern.
EDIT: please note, that async
/await
doesn't help here, as I don't have a Task to await! I just have an access to a handler that will be run on another thread.
In C#:
Task<T>
is a future (or Task
for a unit-returning future).TaskCompletionSource<T>
is a promise.So your code would translate as such:
// var promise = new Promise<MyResult>;
var promise = new TaskCompletionSource<MyResult>();
// handlerMyEventsWithHandler(msg => promise.Complete(msg););
handlerMyEventsWithHandler(msg => promise.TrySetResult(msg));
// var myResult = promise.Future.Await(2000);
var completed = await Task.WhenAny(promise.Task, Task.Delay(2000));
if (completed == promise.Task)
; // Do something on timeout
var myResult = await completed;
Assert.Equals("my header", myResult.Header);
The "timed asynchronous wait" is a bit awkward, but it's also relatively uncommon in real-world code. For unit tests, I would just do a regular asynchronous wait:
var promise = new TaskCompletionSource<MyResult>();
handlerMyEventsWithHandler(msg => promise.TrySetResult(msg));
var myResult = await promise.Task;
Assert.Equals("my header", myResult.Header);