Is there an equivalent to 'continue' in a Parallel.ForEach?

c# foreach parallel-processing
John Egbert picture John Egbert · Sep 22, 2010 · Viewed 58.2k times · Source

I am porting some code to Parallel.ForEach and got an error with a continue I have in the code. Is there something equivalent I can use in a Parallel.ForEach functionally equivalent to continue in a foreach loop?

Parallel.ForEach(items, parallelOptions, item =>
{
    if (!isTrue)
        continue;
});

Answer

dave picture dave · Sep 22, 2010 
return;

(the body is just a function called for each item)

Related questions

Should I always use Parallel.Foreach because more threads MUST speed up everything?

Does it make sense to you to use for every normal foreach a parallel.foreach loop ? When should I start using parallel.foreach, only iterating 1,000,000 items?

Read More
How do you get the index of the current iteration of a foreach loop?

Is there some rare language construct I haven't encountered (like the few I've learned recently, some on Stack Overflow) in C# to get a value representing the current iteration of a foreach loop? For instance, I currently do something like …

Read More
Update all objects in a collection using LINQ

Is there a way to do the following using LINQ? foreach (var c in collection) { c.PropertyToSet = value; } To clarify, I want to iterate through each object in a collection and then update a property on each object. My use …

Read More