I just wanted to hear some authorities on when and where you should use a LITERAL
control over a LABEL
.
As I understand it, the difference is this: A LABEL
can be styled via the <SPAN>
tags that are added.
I personally find the addition of <SPAN>
tags in my HTML to be very annoying and never actually apply styles through ASP, and so LITERAL
s seem to be what should be used most of the time... but I'm concerned there's other considerations or benefits to using a LABEL over it that I'm unaware of.
Is it 100% fine to replace any LABEL
s with LITERAL
s, provided we're not applying styles to them? Are there NO other considerations?
Yep, the main difference is that Literal
controls just render out text, but Label
controls surround it with <span>
tags (Unless you use the AssociatedControlID
property, in which case a Label
control will render a <label>
tag).
So, labels can be styled easier, but if you're just inserting text, literals are the way to go. Literal controls also have a handy property Mode
which governs how the text is rendered. You can have it HTML-encoded, or rendered without any changes, or have any "unsupported markup-language elements" removed.
If you're not applying any styles (e.g. by using Label
's CssClass
property), it will be fine to replace Label
controls with Literal
controls.