Entity Framework code first: How to ignore classes

Chris picture Chris · Jun 4, 2015 · Viewed 15.3k times · Source

This is similar to questions here and here, but those are old and have no good answers.

Let's say I have the following classes:

class HairCutStyle { 
   public int ID { get; set; }
   public string Name { get; set; }
}

class CustomerHairCutPreference {
   public int ID { get; set; }
   public Customer Customer { get; set; }
   public HairCutStyle HairCutStyle { get; set; }
}

Let's say my HairCutStyle data is stored in a table in another database (I get it from Paul Mitchell himself). I want to use the HairCutStyle class as a POCO class - something that I will use in code to represent hair cut styles, but I don't need to read/write that information in my database. (Assume I have a separate service layer that can populate the data for these classes from the other database.)

How can I tell EF NOT to create a HairCutStyle table in my current db context? But at the same time, I want to store a value in the CustomerHairCutPreference table that is a reference to the HairCutStyle data stored elsewhere. A "virtual" foreign key of sorts, that isn't constrained by an actual database FK constraint.

Answer

Claies picture Claies · Jun 4, 2015

Add a property in CustomerHairCutPreference for HairCutSytleID and then use the [NotMapped] attribute on the HairCutStyle property. Note, however, that you will then be responsible for ensuring that the HairCutStyle and HairCutStyleID stay in sync.

class CustomerHairCutPreference {
   public int ID { get; set; }
   public Customer Customer { get; set; }
   public int HairCutStyleID {get; set; }

   [NotMapped]
   public HairCutStyle HairCutStyle { get; set; }
}

Alternatively, you can use the FluentAPI to exclude HairCutStyle completely from ever being mapped by Entity Framework, which may be useful if you have multiple classes that link to it.

protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder) {
    modelBuilder.Ignore<HairCutStyle>();
}