What is the difference between returning IQueryable<T>
vs. IEnumerable<T>
, when should one be preferred over the other?
IQueryable<Customer> custs = from c in db.Customers
where c.City == "<City>"
select c;
IEnumerable<Customer> custs = from c in db.Customers
where c.City == "<City>"
select c;
Yes, both will give you deferred execution.
The difference is that IQueryable<T>
is the interface that allows LINQ-to-SQL (LINQ.-to-anything really) to work. So if you further refine your query on an IQueryable<T>
, that query will be executed in the database, if possible.
For the IEnumerable<T>
case, it will be LINQ-to-object, meaning that all objects matching the original query will have to be loaded into memory from the database.
In code:
IQueryable<Customer> custs = ...;
// Later on...
var goldCustomers = custs.Where(c => c.IsGold);
That code will execute SQL to only select gold customers. The following code, on the other hand, will execute the original query in the database, then filtering out the non-gold customers in the memory:
IEnumerable<Customer> custs = ...;
// Later on...
var goldCustomers = custs.Where(c => c.IsGold);
This is quite an important difference, and working on IQueryable<T>
can in many cases save you from returning too many rows from the database. Another prime example is doing paging: If you use Take
and Skip
on IQueryable
, you will only get the number of rows requested; doing that on an IEnumerable<T>
will cause all of your rows to be loaded in memory.