At the moment, when I iterate over the DataRow instances, I do this.
foreach(DataRow row in table)
return yield new Thingy { Name = row["hazaa"] };
Sooner of later (i.e. sooner), I'll get the table to be missing the column donkey and the poo will hit the fan. After some extensive googling (about 30 seconds) I discovered the following protection syntax.
foreach(DataRow row in table)
if(row.Table.Columns.Contains("donkey"))
return yield new Thingy { Name = row["hazaa"] };
else
return null;
Now - is this the simplest syntax?! Really? I was expecting a method that gets me the field if it exists or null otherwise. Or at least a Contains method directly on the row.
Am I missing something? I'll be mapping in many fields that way so the code will look dreadfully unreadable...
You can create an extension method to make it cleaner:
static class DataRowExtensions
{
public static object GetValue(this DataRow row, string column)
{
return row.Table.Columns.Contains(column) ? row[column] : null;
}
}
Now call it like below:
foreach(DataRow row in table)
return yield new Thingy { Name = row.GetValue("hazaa") };