I am a little bit confused about the fact that we can just catch an OutOfMemoryException
using a try/catch block.
Given the following code:
Console.WriteLine("Starting");
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
{
try
{
OutOfMemory();
}
catch (Exception exception)
{
Console.WriteLine(exception.ToString());
}
}
try
{
StackOverflow();
}
catch (Exception exception)
{
Console.WriteLine(exception.ToString());
}
Console.WriteLine("Done");
The methods I used to create the OutOfMemory + StackOverflowException:
public static void OutOfMemory()
{
List<byte[]> data = new List<byte[]>(1500);
while (true)
{
byte[] buffer = new byte[int.MaxValue / 2];
for (int i = 0; i < buffer.Length; i++)
{
buffer[i] = 255;
}
data.Add(buffer);
}
}
static void StackOverflow()
{
StackOverflow();
}
It prints out the OutOfMemoryException
10 times and then terminates due to the StackOverflowException
, which it can't handle.
The RAM graph looks like that while executing the program:
My question now it why are we able to catch the OutOfMemoryException
? After catching it we can just go on execute any code we want. As proven by the RAM graph, there is memory released. How does the runtime know which objects it can GC and which are still required for further execution?
The GC makes an analysis on the references that are used in the program, and can throw away any object that isn't used anywhere.
An OutOfMemoryException
doesn't mean that the memory is completely depleted, it just means that a memory allocation failed. If you tried to allocate a large memory area at once, there may still be plenty of free memory left.
When there isn't enough free memory for an allocation, the system does a garbage collection to try to free up memory. If there still isn't enough memory for the allocation, it will throw the exception.
A StackOverflowException
is not possible to handle, because it means that the stack is full, and it's not possible to remove anything from it as it is with the heap. You would need more stack space to continue running the code that would handle the exception, but there is no more.