Do you need a strongly named Redis library? In all likelihood, especially if you never even encountered this term, the answer is no. But read on.
What is strongly named?
- it's a .NET specific thing
- you can choose to sign your assembly with a cryptographic key
- this makes it possible to verify that you are actually loading/running something you expect to load/run
- the "strong name" includes the cryptographic signature together with the the usual name, version and things like that.
Do you ever need strong names?
- probably not unless you have specific reasons. Some of these may be:
- historic (we used to sign our assemblies and why change now)
- corporate policies
- special circumstances such as something else you are using requires strong names (it used to be a requirement to have strong name if you wanted to add something to the GAC)
- possibly security considerations
Is it a good idea to sign your assemblies?
- there are a lot of divided opinions
- very often strong names are a pain in so many ways with questionable benefits
- it has been a trend lately to not use strong names unless you really must
Do you need a strongly named Redis library?
- unless you decide or have to sign your own application which uses Redis library you don't
- the strong names version of Redis library is identical to the other one
- it exists solely for the reason to make lives of those who need to use strong names easier