I'm confused a little.
See this simple directive:
@Directive({
selector: '[myDirective]'
})
export class MyDirective {
private text: string;
private enabled: boolean;
@Input() myDirective:string;
@Input('myText')
set myText(val: string) {
this.text = val;
}
@Input('myEnabled')
set myEnabled(val: boolean) {
this.enabled = val;
}
ngOnInit() {
console.log("myDirective string: " + this.myDirective);
console.log("myText string: " + this.text);
console.log("myEnabled boolean: " + this.enabled);
}
}
if my html will look like this:
<div [myDirective]="myDefaultText" [myEnabled]="true" [myText]="abc"></div>
The output will be:
myDirective string: myDefaultText real value // good
myEnabled boolean: true // good
myText string: undefined // Why?
If I REMOVE the [] from myText
:
<div [myDirective]="myDefaultText" [myEnabled]="true" myText="abc"></div>
The output will be:
myDirective string: myDefaultText real value // good
myEnabled boolean: true // good
myText string: abc // GOOD
I can also remove the []
from myEnabled
and it will work too.
So here is my confusion - when I need to use square brackets []
and when not, while I want the user who is going to use myDirective
will never need to wonder if or if not, I think the square brackets []
should always be there. Aren't they?
When you use []
to bind to an @Input()
, it's basically a template expression.
The same way displaying {{abc}}
wouldn't display anything (unless you actually had a variable called abc
).
If you have a string @Input()
, and you want to bind it to a constant string, you could bind it like this: [myText]=" 'some text' "
, or in short, like a normal HTML attribute: myText="some text"
.
The reason [myEnabled]="true"
worked is because true
is a valid template expression which of course evaluates to the boolean true
.