Android RuntimeException: Unable to instantiate the service

ram picture ram · Feb 17, 2011 · Viewed 62.4k times · Source

I want to create a service which will run on a separate thread (not on UI Thread), so I implemented a class which will extend IntentService. But I haven't got any luck. Here is the code.

public class MyService extends IntentService {

    public MyService(String name) {
        super(name);
        // TODO Auto-generated constructor stub
    }

    @Override
    public IBinder onBind(Intent arg0) {
        // TODO Auto-generated method stub
        return null;
    }

    @Override
    public void onCreate() {
        // TODO Auto-generated method stub
        super.onCreate();
        Log.e("Service Example", "Service Started.. ");
        // pushBackground();

    }

    @Override
    public void onDestroy() {
        // TODO Auto-generated method stub
        super.onDestroy();
        Log.e("Service Example", "Service Destroyed.. ");
    }

    @Override
    protected void onHandleIntent(Intent arg0) {
        // TODO Auto-generated method stub
        for (long i = 0; i <= 1000000; i++) {
            Log.e("Service Example", " " + i);
            try {
                Thread.sleep(700);
            } catch (InterruptedException e) {
                // TODO Auto-generated catch block
                e.printStackTrace();
            }
        }
    }
}

Service Consumption in an Activity Button click:

public void onclick(View view) {
Intent svc = new Intent(this, MyService.class);
    startService(svc);
}

Answer

FrVaBe picture FrVaBe · Feb 17, 2011

In your concrete implementation you have to declare a default constructor which calls the public IntentService (String name) super constructor of the abstract IntentService class you extend:

public MyService () {
  super("MyServerOrWhatever");
}

You do not need to overwrite onStartCommand if the super implementation fits for you (what I expect).

In your current case you should get an exception (Unable to instantiate service...) - it is always worth to put this in the question.