Both can be used to find the shortest path from single source. BFS runs in O(E+V)
, while Dijkstra's runs in O((V+E)*log(V))
.
Also, I've seen Dijkstra used a lot like in routing protocols.
Thus, why use Dijkstra's algorithm if BFS can do the same thing faster?
Dijkstra allows assigning distances other than 1 for each step. For example, in routing the distances (or weights) could be assigned by speed, cost, preference, etc. The algorithm then gives you the shortest path from your source to every node in the traversed graph.
Meanwhile BFS basically just expands the search by one “step” (link, edge, whatever you want to call it in your application) on every iteration, which happens to have the effect of finding the smallest number of steps it takes to get to any given node from your source (“root”).