I have an application (http://localhost/MyApp
), where some of the parts are rendered through IFRAMES. These iframed parts has no business with the rest of the application's DOM, so I applied the sandbox
attribute.
The IFRAME is declared like this:
<iframe src="/MyApp/en/html/action?id=1" sandbox="allow-forms allow-scripts" seamless="seamless"></iframe>
The iframed page has a button that makes a AJAX call to the same web application, but then rather than a HTTP GET
, the browser issues a HTTP OPTIONS
that appears as Cancelled
, and an error happens:
XMLHttpRequest cannot load http://localhost/MyApp/en/data/action?id=1. Cannot make any requests from null.
Ajax State 0 Error: HTTP 0
If I add the allow-same-origin
to the sandbox
attribute, it works.As far as I read here, it was not supposed to affect AJAX calls.
Why is this happening? Is considering the path /MyApp/en/html/action
as origin of the whole IFRAME and blocking the request to previous levels?
Cheers.
The reason it affects Ajax is because Ajax is governed by the Same Origin Policy rules, and when you sandbox it you're effectively telling the browser to treat the iframe
contents as if it were from a different origin. Quoting the same article:
- Unique origin treatment. All content is treated under a unique origin. The content is not able to traverse the DOM or read cookie information.
This means that even content coming from the same domain is treated with the cross-domain policy, as each IFRAME content will be viewed as a unique origin.
Embedded content is only permitted to display information. No other actions can be done inside the IFRAME that could compromise the hosting website or take advantage of the users’ trust.
In other words, if you omit the allow-same-origin
in the sandbox
attribute, it will treat the sandboxed page as belonging to a different domain (in fact, it will treat as having a null
origin). Since it doesn't make sense to make Ajax requests to null
, sandboxed pages can not make Ajax calls at all (if making them to localhost
were allowed they would be indistinguishable from the calls from the parent page, defeating the purpose of sandboxing).
If you try to make an Ajax call to a different domain, it will obviously fail:
<script src="http://code.jquery.com/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script>
console.log(location.host);
$.post('https://google.com/',{},function() { });
</script>
However, how it will fail will depend on the sandbox attribute used. If you embed the page above in an iframe
with allow-same-origin
it will print this to the console:
localhost
XMLHttpRequest cannot load https://google.com/. Origin http://localhost is not allowed by Access-Control-Allow-Origin.
...and if you embed it without allow-same-origin
:
localhost
XMLHttpRequest cannot load https://google.com/. Cannot make any requests from null.
Note that, while both reported location.host
as localhost
, one considered the origin to be http://localhost
while the other considered it to be null
(showing the same error message you experienced in your example).
Why is it so important to block Ajax calls from sandboxed contents from the same domain? As explained in the article:
It kind of makes sense that content on the same domain should be safe. The risk here primarily stems from user-generated content that is re-hosted in the IFRAME.
Let's make up an example: suppose Facebook decides to allow users post little HTML5 animations in their pages. It stores them in its own servers and, when displaying, sandboxes them as allow-scripts
only (because scripts are needed for the animations to work) but leave everything else denied (in particular allow-same-origin
, since you don't want user code messing up with the parent page). What would happen if Ajax calls weren't also blocked by default?
Mallory creates an "animation" that consists of:
Performing an Ajax call to Facebook, using its API (say, Open Graph); the server will happily accept the call, since for all it knows the request came from a page with https://facebook.com
as origin.
Create a URI pointing to her own server, with the returned data as query strings, and set it as the src
of a picture in the sandboxed page.
When Alice visits Mallory profile, and sees the animation, the script above runs:
The Ajax call runs in Alice's browser, while Alice is logged on; since the server does not know where the call comes from (main page or embedded page) it will do whatever it's asked to - including retrieving personal info.
When the img
element is created with Mallory's URI, the browser will attempt to load the "image" normally, since images are exempt from the Same Origin Policy.
Since the URI has Alice's private info in the query string, Mallory's server can just save it and return whatever image it wants. Now Mallory has Alice's personal info, and Alice suspects nothing.