What's the difference between .NET CoreCLR, CoreRT, Roslyn and LLILC

.net clr roslyn coreclr corert
Robert Zaremba picture Robert Zaremba · Jan 7, 2016 · Viewed 11.6k times · Source

Recently I started reading about .NET reorganization details (mostly through .NET Core github pages). It seams that they created sibling projects to support more platforms. While reading I have the impression that CoreCLR and CoreRT is a new OpenSource version of propriety Roslyn compiler. CoreRT provides native (AOT) compilation. And LLILC is an alternative implementation directing LLVM framework.

Can anyone confirm and describe the differences and goals of this projects from the user perspective? Why someone would use Roslyn in the future instead of CoreCLR?

Answer

Hadi Brais picture Hadi Brais · Jan 27, 2016

Roslyn is a compiler platform that enables you to build static and dynamic analysis tools and custom language extensions and transformations for the C# and VB programming languages.It also enables you to embed these languages within other languages or applications. Roslyn includes the C# and VB compilers and other tools. These compilers emit Common Intermediate Language (CIL) code.

To run this code, CIL has to be compiled into binary code that the target computer architecture can execute. .NET currently provides three ways to do this:

  1. Compile the CIL code into binary code using a JIT compiler while the app is running. This model is implemented by CoreCLR. CoreCLR started as a copy of CLR. It has been modified to support different OSes. They're maintained separately and in parallel.
  2. Compile the CIL code into binary code and integrate any required .NET framework components to produce a single-file self-contained executable whose performance is closer to code written native languages. This technology is called .NET Native. CoreRT is an open-source implementation of this technology. The main difference between .NET Native and CoreRT is that the AOT compiler that the former uses is the UTC compiler (the MSVC compiler backend) while the latter currently uses RyuJIT. UTC is much more aggressive in optimizing the code than RyuJIT. Also in CoreRT, some components of the runtime have been cleanly reimplemented in C#. CoreCLR still uses the C++ implementation.
  3. NGEN which is similar to .NET Native except that the produced executables are not self-contained and requires an externally installed runtime.

LLILC is a CIL compiler based on the portable LLVM compiler framework. It can be used to build JIT (current) and AOT (future) compilers. The advantage of this compiler is that it leverages the Clang C++ compiler optimizations and brings the LLVM extensibility model (analysis and optimization passes) to .NET.

CoreRT and LLILC are new projects and still in early development stage and require a lot more work to support production applications. So if you are a user and not a contributor, CoreCLR and Roslyn are for you. Again, CoreCLR is the runtime while Roslyn is the C# and VB compilers.

Related questions

Resolving MSB3247 - Found conflicts between different versions of the same dependent assembly

A .NET 3.5 solution ended up with this warning when compiling with msbuild. Sometimes NDepend might help out but in this case it didn't give any further details. Like Bob I ended up having to resort to opening each assembly in …

Read More
What are major differences between C# and Java?

I just want to clarify one thing. This is not a question on which one is better, that part I leave to someone else to discuss. I don't care about it. I've been asked this question on my job interview …

Read More
Try-catch speeding up my code?

I wrote some code for testing the impact of try-catch, but seeing some surprising results. static void Main(string[] args) { Thread.CurrentThread.Priority = ThreadPriority.Highest; Process.GetCurrentProcess().PriorityClass = ProcessPriorityClass.RealTime; long start = 0, stop = 0, elapsed = 0; double avg = 0.0; long temp = Fibo(1); for (…

Read More