Cleanup vs Dispose(bool) in MVVM-light

Budda picture Budda · Jun 3, 2010 · Viewed 14.6k times · Source

In the latest version of MVVM-light (V3 SP1) both "Dispose()" and "Dispose(bool)" methods in ViewModel class are marked

Do not use this method anymore, it will be removed in a future version. Use ICleanup.Cleanup() instead

Does this mean that IDisposable interface must not be implemented in all ViewModel classes that are derived from GalaSoft.MvvmLight.ViewModelBase (and cleanup must be overrided)?

If yes, using can't be used for view-model instances... Probably I didn't understand something... Please clarify... What are the benefits of such cleaning up?

Thanks.

Answer

LBugnion picture LBugnion · Jun 4, 2010

The issue is historical. At first I thought it would be a good idea to force all VMs to be IDisposable. However, IDisposable has a different intent: Once the VM is Disposed, it is expected (by convention) that it will be garbage collected as soon as possible. After talking to friends, I realize that forcing all VMs to be IDisposable was a mistake. This is why I replaced IDisposable by ICleanup. The intent of ICleanup is to provide a way to clean VMs (for example flushing their state to persistent storage, closing streams etc...) but not necessarily in a way that they will be garbage collected as soon as possible.

Nothing prevents you to make your VMs implement IDisposable. I just didn't want to keep this constraint in the ViewModelBase class, which is why this interface will be removed in V4.

The benefit of having ICleanup is that you can clean all your VMs in one call of ViewModelLocator.Cleanup(). It is a hint to VM developers saying that VMs should think of providing a cleanup method for their VMs.

Does that make sense? Cheers, Laurent